Regardless, myth takes the place of history as Roland Barthes would say. Kathleen Hanna is one of the many founding members of the Riot Grrrl movement, but is given most of the credit for its inception and drive. The Riot Grrrl scene is credited with a lot; third wave feminist revival, resistance to violent-male-dominated punk rock shows, inspiration for girls to start bands, and embracing the words slut and bitch! Riot Grrrl began in a small town (primarily populated by white middle class, which has been a legitimate criticism for the movement's exclusion, whether it be purposeful or coincidental) in Washington State called Olympia. A group of girls, many of whom attended the progressive liberal arts college Evergreen, began getting together women to talk about gender, music, art, and whatever else came up. They began setting up shows together of female bands and creating zines (low budget, uncensored d.i.y little magazines). Tobi Vail was making a zine called "Riot Grrrl" and this became the referential name for what was taking place. The 'catch phrases' became "Revolution, grrrl style, now!" and "Grrrl Power!" Slowly, people in other states and finally countries began catching on and some of the girls moved to Washington D.C to spread the riot.
Once the media got a hold of the spreading scene, the subversive intentions of its participants were manipulated, altered and exploited. The radical activism of the women was not a representation of femininity that could sell. The riot grrrl message was marginalized by magazines from Newsweek to Rolling Stone to Seventeen. Kathleen Hanna was the most outspoken (and perhaps considered one of the prettier) riot grrrls so much of the media attention was placed on her band Bikini Kill. Interviewers sought out controversial statements and often misquoted the women or did not put their words in an appropriate context. The women's efforts were usually marginalized as a group of girls parading in their underwear trying to be fierce, calling their attempts "cute" or criticizing them for not being political enough in their intentions.
Around the same time, the phrase "Girl Power" was reappropriated for the "band" The Spice Girls. What was once a subversive message was reduced to a phrase that praised and gave 'power' to women for dressing in provocative clothing and representing different male fantasies. Many Riot Grrrls distanced themselves from the scene at this time, and many refused to discuss the issue for years because of the frustration and pain caused by the experience.
If you are interested in checking out some Riot Grrrl bands, books movies here is a list of some to start you off:
Heavens to Betsy
Bratmobile
Sleater-Kinney
Bikini Kill
Huggy Bear
The Slits
Babes in Toyland
Team Dresch
Sarah Dyer's Action Girl comics
Don't Need You: The Herstory of Riot Grrrl (movie)
movie trailer:
2 comments:
I dunno, the Dyer-edited Action Girl have always struck me as fairly tame. Not bad, necessarily, but not biting, either.
In any case, a great post. I was struck by this:
Once the media got a hold of the spreading scene, the subversive intentions of its participants were manipulated, altered and exploited.
This is so very relevant to our recent class discussions that it almost seems to have been ripped from the pages of the Audience Studies Reader! Fiske on incorporation/containment comes to mind here, as does Muggleton on the familiar charge that the "media" ruin things.
Re: "girl power," ugh, it's usually, as you suggest, a matter of guys' fantasies passed off as Lara Croft-style "female" empowerment tropes. The Charlie's Angels phenomenon: male fantasies are stroked in pseudo-feminist guise, as in, "You go, girl, but preferably in scanty clothing." Bah.
I remember the Spice Girls when their popularity grew in the United States in 1997(or was it 1998?). As a thirteen-year-old back then, I was not a big fan of theirs. That time, I wasn't used to the style of clothes they were wearing; I thought it was too adult or inappropriate that they would wear "provocative clothing." After ten years however, it doesn't bother me that much, but thinking about it now, it makes me wonder what teenagers today might think if they see some of their favorite female performers wear clothes that show too much skin. I'm not sure if it is about rebellion today as much as it might've been before. I think this style is more about appealing to a wider audience range.
Post a Comment